Top Democrats hate nothing more than President Donald J. Trump, but data centers are a very close second. And yet Democrats and data centers are the best of frenemies.

“We need a federal moratorium on AI data centers,” insists Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. He also said on Sept. 15, “AI is an existential threat to humanity.” Even worse, he told CBS News that day: “The potential danger of AI is probably greater than nuclear weapons.” So, evidently, Nagasaki was a light breeze compared to ChatGPT.

Sanders announced Wednesday that he wants a U.S. Department of Artificial Intelligence to ride herd on AI, or “Super Intelligence,” as Trump rechristened this incredible technology in his address to the United Nations the previous morning.

Sanders’ protégé concurs with her mentor.

“Congress has a moral obligation to stand with the American people and stop the expansion of these data centers until we have a framework to adequately address the existential harm AI poses to our society,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., asserted on June 24.

Far-Left Democratic candidates also have data centers on their hit lists.

“We got to stop data centers from being built if they can’t meet the demands of our communities,” U.S. Senate hopeful James Talarico declared in Texas. His counterpart in Michigan, Abdul E-Sayed, boiled it down to six words: “People really f—ing hate data centers.”

It would be easier to take these and other Democratic foes of data centers more seriously if they did not depend daily on data centers.

At the very top of Sanders’ U.S. Senate website, right beside his photo, he invites visitors to “Follow Me on Facebook” and “Follow me on Twitter.”Sanders’ missives on “greedy billionaires,” Medicare for All, and so much more all sit on computer servers that are housed within data centers. Many are financed by multi-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg and trillionaire Elon Musk. Sanders’ official government website also preaches the proletarian gospel—from deep inside data centers.

Ocasio-Cortez has 4.1 million followers on TikTok. At a quick glance, her account features at least 238 videos on everything from a “Forgiveness Plan” to “Team AOC donates turkeys.” These clips are not roasting inside some oven at 350 degrees. They exist within data centers, waiting for data-center detractors to click onto them.

The campaign website for Talarico for Texas welcomes donations payable via Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover. Those who are not into credit cards may back his race by using Google Pay, PayPal, and Venmo. ActBlue, the Democrats’ dodgy e-bagman, coordinates this for Talarico and other Democratic candidates.

All of the above is possible, thanks to data centers. Without them, Talarico and other candidates would have to open envelopes delivered by the Post Office, extract paper checks, and then hand those funds to bank tellers for manual processing. Ah, the good ol’ days!

Try as he might, Michigan’s El-Sayed cannot shake his previously beloved Hasan Piker.

Comments such as “Zionism is fascism” and “I want Chinese style Communism” keep cascading from this online extremist’s mouth. El-Sayed pretends not to know Piker, but El-Sayed cannot erase the indelible evidence of their now-curdled courtship.

El-Sayed appeared on Piker’s podcast, by Piker’s count, “a hundred times.” These are nestled, and ripe for inspection, within data centers.

“The bitter irony in this debate is that Bernie Sanders, AOC, and their fellow travelers use data centers every day to post anti-data center slop on social media,” James S. Erwin observes. Americans for Tax Reform’s Director of Innovation Policy adds: “Comrade Sanders uses data centers when he invites agents of the Chinese Communist Party onto Zoom calls, so they can lecture Americans on AI safety. Unless they’re using carrier pigeons, all of this anti-data center propaganda depends on America’s vast infrastructure of data centers.”

Top Democrats avail themselves of America’s 5,427 data centers while hammering such facilities.

Tech-savvy heroes? They are tech-hating hypocrites.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled 6-3 to permit President Donald Trump's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) streamlined Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program ahead of this year's midterm elections.

The post SCOTUS Rules 6-3 to Permit Trump’s Streamlined Voter Verification System Ahead of Midterms appeared first on Breitbart.

“ … those who are trying to hide the truth from the American people.” ~ Tulsi Gabbard

Judicial Watch sued in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia after the ODNI failed to respond to a July 31, 2026, FOIA request “for records concerning the discovery, location, contents, and handling of the materials referenced by Director Gabbard, as well as communications about their discovery and records about any inquiry into why the materials were designated for destruction.”

On August 26, 2025, Gabbard confirmed to President Trump during a cabinet meeting that ODNI had identified burn bags containing information regarding corruption in the 2020 presidential election. “We are finding documents literally tucked away in the back of safes in random offices, in these bags and in other areas—which, again, speaks to the intent of those who are trying to hide the truth from the American people.” She added that the documents revealed the politicization of intelligence and caused immeasurable harm to the American people.

Judicial Watch said in its suit:

As of the date of this Complaint, ODNI has failed to: (i) determine whether to comply with the request; (ii) notify Plaintiff of any such determination or the reasons therefor; (iii) advise Plaintiff of the right to appeal any adverse determination; or (iv) produce the requested records or otherwise demonstrate that the requested records are exempt from production.

“There is no legitimate reason to continue sitting on these documents that will likely add further evidence of the corruption at the top of the Biden administration,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Judicial Watch has another similar suit pending.

In August, a federal judge ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to provide answers about nearly 2 million pages of FBI records discovered in a “hidden room” at FBI headquarters, including whether the records have already been reviewed in response to other Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and whether the newly uncovered records had been stored in other government record systems.

In July, the FBI told a federal court that, at a rate of 500 pages a month, processing records from the “hidden room” at FBI Headquarters would take approximately 158 years. The room — now dubbed the “burn bag room” —  holds over 2 million pages of records, according to the FBI’s own filing. Then-Deputy Director Bongino said in May 2025 that some of the records were found stashed “in bags.”

In February, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice concerning the discovery and contents of “burn bags” found in a secured Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) at Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) headquarters in Washington, DC.

###

The post Judicial Watch Sues Director of National Intelligence for Biden Era Documents Exposing 2020 Election... appeared first on Judicial Watch.

President Donald Trump this week mourned the death of Jim Copenhaver, a rallygoer who was shot during the 2024 Butler, Pennsylvania, event that saw an assassination attempt on the then candidate for president.

The post Trump Mourns Death of Rallygoer Shot in Butler Assassination Attempt appeared first on Breitbart.

The Department of Health and Human Services is pushing back against the Human Rights Campaign’s condemnation of hospitals that have agreed to stop providing transgender procedures to minors, accusing activists of making “unfounded claims” linking restrictions on the procedures to violence.

“Protecting children from irreversible sex-rejecting procedures is not discrimination, and HHS will not allow unfounded claims linking these protections to violence to distract from the serious medical risks facing vulnerable children,” an HHS spokesperson told the Daily Signal in a statement Friday.

The statement marks the administration’s latest defense of efforts to halt transgender medical interventions for minors as major hospital systems across the country are reaching settlements with the Trump administration.

HRC issued a statement Wednesday condemning at least six hospitals that entered into settlements with the Trump administration and agreed to halt sex-rejecting procedures for minors.

Since May, six hospital systems have agreed to stop providing sex-rejecting procedures to minors. The systems include Texas Children’s Hospital, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Connecticut Children’s Hospital, Mount Sinai Health System, NYU Langone Hospitals, and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

HRC called the trend “a crisis for families and transgender youth,” noting that even in states that passed laws to protect the controversial procedures, hospitals are stopping them. “Our thoughts are with the countless families across the country who feel scared and under siege,” HRC President Kelley Robinson said.

HRC has repeatedly claimed that “anti-transgender” laws lead to violence against transgender people. The statement claimed that the procedures are “best-practice, and potentially life-saving health care.”

Yet HHS released a peer-reviewed review last year finding “extremely weak evidence” for any benefits from “gender-affirming care” for young people.

Last month, HHS released “Wolves in White Coats,” a report focused on how medical professionals used false medical billing codes to prescribe so-called puberty blockers for minors.

HHS and other administration officials have challenged activist claims that restricting transgender medical interventions increases suicide, violence, or other harms. The administration has argued that the evidence supporting “puberty blockers,” cross-sex hormones, and surgeries for minors is weak and that the procedures carry significant risks.

The HHS spokesperson cited the Wolves in White Coats report, stating that “these procedures carry significant risks to children’s physical and mental health, including lifelong consequences.”

“Under President Trump and Secretary Kennedy’s leadership, HHS will continue putting children’s health first and advancing policies grounded in the best available science,” the spokesperson concluded.

The VX-4HD is supposed to split the difference between Leupold's VX-3HD and VX-5HD. After several months behind the 3-12x40, here's where it actually fits.

The post Putting the Leupold VX-4HD 3-12x40mm Scope Through Its Paces appeared first on The Truth About Guns.

Thursday’s episode of “The Tony Kinnett Cast” featured a discussion with Ben Shapiro centered around the upcoming midterms, including as they pertain to a recent film by The Daily Wire.

Shapiro described “Run, Hide, Fight: Infidels” as a film that “makes clear the threat of political Islam and the most radical manifestation” of that. It has been lambasted by the media despite positive audience reaction.

Shapiro connected the film to his concerns with Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat candidate for Michigan’s U.S. Senate seat.

Shapiro referenced El-Sayed as an example of “putting people in positions of power to cover for the radicalization campaign that’s taken place inside of our borders.”

He took issue with El-Sayed’s response to an attack on a Jewish school in the Detroit suburbs from March, in which El-Sayed said that “hurt people, hurt people” and compared the attack to the Israel Defense Forces killing a member of Hezbollah in Lebanon. “When you put your head in the sand, it’s not as though the problem goes away. It just grows in size and scope,” Shapiro warned.

Kinnett criticized the “very bizarre correlation-causation the Left is trying to run,” saying dissatisfaction with Republicans does not equal enthusiasm for Democrats, a point Shapiro later brought up when discussing “outlier polls.” Kinnett emphasized that he does not see “any excitement for anyone,” calling the 2026 election cycle “the least popular midterms in history.”

Shapiro agreed as he spoke further about Democrats’ motivations. “I think that what you’re seeing from Democrats is excitement to vote against Republicans, which, you know, is worth something. But I don’t think that you’re seeing a lot of enthusiasm for the most radical ideas of El-Sayed, who is “trying to hide the ball” about who he is.

Shapiro also took issue with El-Sayed attempting to distance himself from Hasan Piker, as well as El-Sayed’s non-answer during Wednesday’s event at the University of Michigan, when a young man spoke about the plight his family faced in Iran, only for El-Sayed to offer what Shapiro called “a clear misdirect.”

“The reality is that, again, these candidates are unbelievably radical,” Shapiro said, adding that “Republicans need to keep hammering this home.”

Kinnett and Shapiro also discussed Republicans potentially doing poorly. Shapiro blamed “pseudo-Republicans who have been basically jumping off the train as fast as humanly possible and then casting aspersions.”

While Republicans could underperform due to President Donald Trump’s approval rating or general economic uncertainty, Shapiro said he doesn’t foresee a blue wave. “I think it’s going to be more like a moderate ripple in favor of the Democrats, as opposed to this kind of gigantic tsunami that’s going to eat the entire Republican Party whole,” he added.

First Lady Melania Trump chose an American military-inspired look to host Chinese President Xi Jinping and his wife, First Lady Peng Liyuan, for tea in the Red Room of the White House. 

The post Fashion Notes: Melania Trump Wears Ralph Lauren Military Jacket for Tea in the Red Room appeared first on Breitbart.

Bill Gates, the tech evangelist and leftist billionaire who has suddenly changed his tune to focus on the dangers of AI, told NBC's Meet the Press that artificial intelligence could kill on a scale never before possible.

The post Bill Gates Warns AI Could Cause ‘A Billion Deaths’ Without Government Control appeared first on Breitbart.

A year ago, Sen. John Fetterman’s estrangement from the Democrats seemed like an amusing political sideshow. Now the Pennsylvania Democrat is appearing at a GOP convention and being openly courted by Republican leadership.

Fetterman made a surprise video appearance at the GOP midterm convention in Dallas earlier this month to introduce his Pennsylvania colleague, Republican Sen. Dave McCormick, whom he called a “great American.”

In the video, Fetterman described himself as a “common-sense Democrat,” saying that he rejects socialism and will work with President Donald Trump and McCormick to support Pennsylvania’s steel industry.

When did we fall through the looking glass? Has the tattooed, hoodie-wearing, and famously progressive Fetterman changed parties?

A July Quinnipiac poll found that 77% of Pennsylvania Republicans approved of Fetterman’s job performance, compared with just 19% of Democrats. The same poll indicated that 52% of Pennsylvania voters would like to see Fetterman leave the Democratic Party.

He may find fertile ground with Republicans. In response to an August NYT/Siena poll illustrating Fetterman’s alleged break with his party, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, posted on X, “Please join us, John Fetterman. We’d welcome you in the Senate Republican Conference.” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., agreed, saying he “would welcome the opportunity to have him join the Republican conference.”

This is a remarkable change for a senator who entered Washington as one of the Democratic Party’s most recognizable progressives. Fetterman initially gained some begrudging respect from Republicans, but it has evolved into full-throated support because of his willingness to publicly needle his own party.

But though Fetterman is feted as a voice of reason in a crazed caucus, he’s still as true blue as his Democratic colleagues.

Fetterman regularly clashes with the burgeoning antisemitic wing of his party and maintains staunch support for Israel. He’s backed several Trump nominees, sided with Republicans during last year’s government shutdown, and opposed Democratic efforts to restrict Trump’s prosecution of the war in Iran.

But Fetterman’s Heritage Action scorecard reflects the truth of his political career. The arch-progressive has a whopping  0% score for the 119th Congress and a 4% lifetime score. This session, Fetterman voted against every key vote Heritage Action released.

Beyond scorecards, the most damning reason Fetterman isn’t GOP material is because he himself readily acknowledges he’s not.

“I’m a lifelong Democrat who votes overwhelmingly with my party,” he said following his Republican convention appearance. He assured his Senate colleagues he would still provide the 51st vote if his party won a majority.

Words are wind; meaningless unless backed by matching action.

Fetterman’s record is clear. He is no ally to conservatives and deserves to be treated with deep suspicion. While Republicans may cheer Fetterman for going on FOX to say Democrats have lost the plot, by the numbers he’s worse than many of those same Democrats he mocks.

Conservatives should prefer someone who actually does the right things rather than just criticizing some of the right people.

In Pennsylvania, that distinction has real consequences. Democratic infighting may soon make the seat easier for conservatives to reclaim, but not if we mistake a Democrat for an ally.

Early signs suggest the 2028 Pennsylvania Democratic primary will be a bruiser. Fetterman’s fundraising is in the toilet, and his party seems hellbent on making a difficult Senate map even harder.

For Republicans, Fetterman’s rebellion should not be proof of loyalty to the conservative cause. Praising him for “standing up to the Dems” gives him cover to advance leftism with a veneer of bipartisanship.

A transformation should be judged by what has truly changed, and Fetterman’s voting record hasn’t shifted at all.

Beware a wolf in donkey’s clothing.

"Stop woke" is a "racist dog whistle," Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Angie Nixon — who is hoping to be the next Senator in the Sunshine State — said in a 2023 interview.

The post FL Democrat Senate Candidate Angie Nixon: Stopping Woke Is a ‘Racist Dog Whistle’ appeared first on Breitbart.